Your Feedback Please to the

The Jewish Story Guestbook

CLICK BUTTON
TO GO
TO PAGE

HOME


ISRAEL
MAPS

ISRAEL
 STATISTICS

ISRAEL
PORTAL

FLAG OF
 ISRAEL
(MAGEN DAVID,

STAR OF DAVID)


Area,
Population

Future Economy

Israel

Area and Population
Size in 2024

Israel, West Bank,Gaza,

Golan Heights


VIDEOS

The Spielberg Jewish Film Archive

ISRAEL 1

ISRAEL 2

Economic
Miracle

Overview

Wars,
Peace Treaties
and Defence Expenditure


 Palestine History of a Name


Sykes-Picot

Balfour
Declaration

British
Mandate

Grand Mufti

Creation
of Israel

The UN
Palestine
Partition Plan

Our Future


VIDEOS
Settlements

West Bank
Areas
A, B and C

Settlements

New
Palestinian City
RAWABI


Knessset
(Parliament)
Elections


VIDEOS
Jews Who Fled from Arab Countries

Jews Who Fled from Arab Countries

Reparations for
Jews who Fled
from Arab Countries


Payments to Palestinian Prisoners

Palestinian
Groups

Gaza

and

Hamas


VIDEOS
Boycotts, Antisemitism,

BDS

Boycotts
of Israel

BDS


VIDEOS
Palestinian
Corruption

Palestinian

Corruption


Why Christians
have Fled from
Arab Countries


VIDEOS

Palestinian
Refugees

CHARTS

 Palestinian
Refugees

Legal
Palestine Refugees

Lives of
Palestinian Refugees

Refugees

Today

 Israeli Arabs,

Jewish  and

Palestinian  Refugees


VIDEOS
UNWRA

UNWRA
and
UNHCR

UNWRA and
the USA

Reassessing
UNWRA

UNWRA
Education


Links

CLICK HERE  TO ACCESS  COUNTRIES

T O P I C

4000 YEARS OF
JEWISH HISTORY

Jewish
Timelines


What Was the Holocaust ?

Antisemitism


Who is a Jew?

Ethnic Jewish Groups

The Jewish Law

The Hebrew Bible

Interpretation

The Temples

The Synagogues

Jewish Messiah
Ciaimants

Jewish Conversion

Jewish Women
in Judaism

Jewish
Education

Rashi's  and
Tzaddiks


Marranos

How Are Crypto Jews Different?

Jewish Diaspora

Jewish Festivals

Jewish Languages


Lost Tribes

Jewish-Roman  Wars

Year 1000

Understanding the
Middle Ages

The Inquisition

Jewish Pirates


Why has Christendom
Attacked the Jews?

Catholicism

Islam


Expulsion of the Jews  
from Arab Countries, 1948-2012


I S R A E L

Videos -

Maps -

Mogan David
(Flag of Israel)

Statistics  and Information

Jewish History
Videos

Your Feedback Please to the

jewishwikipedia.info Guestbook

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via e-mail Print

THE

INCREDIBLE

STORY OF THE JEWISH PEOPLE



REASSESSING THE
UNITED NATIONS
RELIEF AND WORKS
AGENCY
(UNRWA)
_________________________


JERUSALEM INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE

This report analyzes the contrasting histories and track records of UNRWA and UNHCR. UNRWA’s original mission has been fatally compromised by a combination of systemic corruption and intervention into the internal political affairs of host countries. Most recently, this has included growing acquiescence, if not outright support, of ideological hostility to Israel and regional terrorism.  

By comparison, UNHCR remains faithful to its original mission, demonstrating a track record of substantive assistance to refugee communities.

Therefore, we recommend the dissolution of UNRWA by its absorption, where useful, into UNHCR.

_____________________________________________________________________________


In 1950, the United Nations created two organizations: the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). Both agencies work with displaced persons, aka ‘refugees’. The UNRWA was established to help refugees of the 1948 war with Israel (Palestinian Arabs). The UNHCR was charged to care for refugees throughout Europe in the aftermath of World War II. This was later broadened to include refugees worldwide.

UNRWA’s mission expanded from the resettlement of refugees in their country of origin to their integration within the economies of their host countries. UNRWA foresaw this leading to refugee independence of relief rolls. Accordingly, sources noted that UNRWA “has not resettled or repatriated any significant number of these refugees.”

“UNRWA is not mandated with permanent resettlement or repatriation. The UNRWA served goal is provide aid until other parties find the solution.”

On the other hand, the UNHCR has developed a great track record for resettling or repatriating refugees.

Not surprisingly, UNRWA and UNHCR define the nature and status of a ‘refugee’ in markedly different ways which mirror their different goals – integration vs repatriation. These definitions shape, critically, how, even whether, UNRWA and UNHCR can fulfill their distinctive missions.

UNHCR defines a ‘refugee’ as:

“a person who is outside his or her country of nationality or habitual residence, has a well founded fear of persecution because of his or her race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion; and is unable or unwilling to avail himself or herself of the protection of that country, or to return there, for fear of persecution.”3

UNRWA defines a refugee as:

“… any person whose normal place of residence was Palestine during the period 1 June 1946 to 15 May 1948 and who lost both home and means of livelihood as a result of the 1948 conflict.

Palestine refugees eligible for UNRWA assistance, are mainly persons who fulfil the above definition and are descendants of fathers fulfilling the definition.”

The population of Arab refugees has (and will) increase over time. Thus, UNRWA’s decision to grant equal program access to their descendants imposes a dramatic and ever-growing strain on the agency’s capacity to provide humanitarian assistance.

The UNHCR, by contrast, limits the number of total refugees accepted into their program. In addition, refugees must choose from one of three options to receive aid:

1) local integration into their host country

2) permanent resettlement to a third country or

3) a return to their home country.

By tying financial aid to the decisions and commitments of refugees, UNHCR can transition recipients to become productive members of their chosen home. None of the choices envision or permit refugees to remain such indefinitely, let alone permanently.

MISSION DRIFT: RESETTLEMENT BECOMES “INTEGRATION”

‘Mission drift’ refers to the common tendency of organizations to change or even transform the purpose for which they were formed.

UNHCR has remained faithful to its assigned mission of facilitating refugee resettlement (repatriation) as well as local integration.

UNRWA, however, no longer promotes resettlement, thus dropping a key element of its original mission. UNRWA also insists that host countries integrate refugees living within their borders on terms set by the organization. Intervention within host countries was wholly absent from UNRWA’s founding charter.

Furthermore, UNRWA insists that host responsibilities do not end with their provision of basic needs and services to refugees who choose integration. Instead, integration must be conceived as a “dynamic, two-way process that places demands on both the refugee and the receiving community.”  The host country, not UNRWA, assumes the financial and legal burden required to build an environment that supports the long-term economic stability of refugees.

As of 2014, the UNHCR has effectively resettled tens of millions refugees in its 65-year history. The UNHCR boasts, accurately, “10 out of every 100 refugees are resettled every year.” Unsurprisingly, the UNRWA shows few measurable results, beyond helping some Palestinian refugees obtain work within their host countries.

UNRWA labels the continual influx of Palestinians who have never been displaced from their homes as ‘refugees.’  This compromises the identity and prospects for 90% of so-called UNRWA ‘refugees’. Worse still, UNRWA promises that refugees will return someday to their ‘ancestral’ homelands. This unrealizable vision, enforced at the highest levels as formal ‘mission’, ripples down the relief chain. Refugees endure the systemic corruption that ensues when mission drift lacks internal integrity.

UNRWA’s ability to foster reintegration in the West Bank and Gaza has declined as “restrictions on access and movement in the region…” to ensure Israeli security have grown.  10 People on the ration rolls in areas other than the West Bank or Gaza face impending unemployment. UNRWA’s educational training programs do qualify refugees in Lebanon, Jordan, and Syria to secure full-time jobs. However, societal discrimination based on their defined status as transients compels refugees in these countries to orient their lives around UNRWA.

Throughout the region, the structural unemployment of refugees, linked to their indefinite dependence upon social services, remains the main inhibitor to UNRWA’s success.

BUDGET

UNRWA’s first budget (1950) approximated $41 million dollars, with 711,000 refugees registered for assistance..Annual budgets have grown, enormously, to $982,179,000, to underwrite support for today’s roughly 5.2 million refugees. The vast majority are descendants of those registered in 1950. One might expect UNRWA efficiency and productivity to have grown over time to match its increased resources. Sadly, the situation of UNRWA refugees reveals scant, if any, substantive improvement in recent decades.

By contrast, UNHCR’s starting budget consisted of a mere $300,000 to care for nearly one million Europeans uprooted at the end of World War II.  UNHCR now deals with 33.9 million people: 14.7 million internally displaced people, 10.5 million refugees, 3.1 million returnees, 3.5 million stateless people, more than 837,000 asylum seekers and more than 3.1 other persons of concern. UNHCR, with a 2013 budget of $2.3 billion, continues to resettle four times as many refugees annually as the UNRWA and is present in over 126 countries. UNRWA operates in only the West Bank, Gaza, Jordan, Syria, and Lebanon.












EMPLOYMENT

At its founding, UNRWA numbered 6,140 employees, including 140 non-regional (international) staff. The vast majority (6,000 or 98%) were refugees themselves. By the end of 2010, this number swelled to nearly 31,000 employees – with a whopping 30,677 comprised of refugees. Again, by stark contrast, UNHCR started with 34 employees of varied international origins.19 This increased to 8,600 employees by 2014, about one/fourth as many as UNRWA.

UNRWA’s refugee-centric employees nurture increased staff affiliation with Hamas and similar terrorist groups. This provokes pressing concerns. According to the U.S. Government Accountability Office, at least 16 UNRWA staff have been detained, and another 3 have been convicted for terrorism-related activities.

As far back as 2004, then-Commissioner-General of UNRWA, Peter Hansen, told the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, tellingly, “I am sure there are Hamas members on the UNRWA payroll, and I don’t see that as a crime. Hamas, as a political organization, does not mean that every member is a militant...”   Furthermore, the UNRWA “makes no attempt to weed out individuals who support extremist positions.”

Hamas, before 2004 and since, boast of their explicit activities aimed at destabilizing the region through terror. Yet, UNRWA’s public statements illustrate knowing consent and acceptance for terrorists to serve as paid staff employees in the hope that a few Hamas employees might not, after all, be ‘militant’.











WHY UNRWA SHOULD BE ABSORBED BY UNHCR

UNRWA has received billions of dollars in both American and European taxpayer payouts for presumed “relief and support” of the Palestinian people.23 Yet, its reintegration policies for refugees must be judged a failure. Its education programs have been co-opted to serve ideological goals; it fosters a culture of systemic corruption and, above all, UNRWA has redefined its mission along lines which make large-scale refugee reintegration impossible.

IDEOLOGICAL SURRENDER

UNRWA’s health, relief and social services, micro-finance and micro-enterprise, infrastructure and camp programs and, especially, its education services, rely upon UNRWA-adopted textbooks supplied by host governments with “a bitterly hostile attitude to Israel.”

Does the ‘curriculum’ taught children by UNRWA teachers from these government textbooks promote regional stability or contribute fresh fuel for a world-view that glorifies terrorism? This question yields a self evident answer.

SYSTEMIC CORRUPTION

Corruption has become the norm at UNRWA. “The UNRWA maintains a staff that is over 4X the size of the UNHCR, and requires half the budget, but only operates in 4% of the countries that UNHCR does and is concerned with only 13% of the number of people the UNHCR handles.”

UNRWA has been subject to minimal public scrutiny and offers very limited transparency. Its main website does not contain specifics to describe where contributed funds have gone nor how they have been spent. The author of this article spent almost 15 hours investigating by phone, email, and diligent search of UNRWA’s website for employee and budget numbers with little success. When queried, an UNRWA representative in Brussels explained, unhelpfully, that, “UNRWA maintains its transparency, but does not have the resources needed to upload every  single document to the web regarding its 65 year history.”

Interestingly, the author received prompt and useful feedback, upon request, from UNHCR staff.

COLLABORATION WITH TERRORIST ACTIVITIES

In 2007, a prominent Australian Member of Parliament, Michael Danby, protested UNRWA funding support by that nation. He termed UNRWA “a notoriously corrupt” institution that participates in activities related to “arms purchase, terrorist operations, and anti-Israel incitement, as well as (lining) the pockets of the PA leadership.”

On July 22, 2014, a Jerusalem Post article reported that terrorist rockets were found in an UNRWA facility in Gaza. UNRWA authorities agreed to release the rockets to a “rocket pickup” team but was vague on what ultimately happened with the rockets.” UNRWA has been accused, consequently, of committing a war crime, given the potential that these weapons have been or could be handed over to Hamas.

ABSORBING UNRWA INTO UNHCR

The United States underwrote 65% of UNRWA’s annual budget through the 1960s. This percentage had decreased to 24% by 2013, revealing U.S. hesitancy to fund UNRWA’s dramatically-changed mission, especially in light of its diminished transparency. Even discounting UNRWA’s lack of transparency, the agency locks Palestinian refugees into perpetual refugee status across generations.









As the United States pushes for a full audit of UNRWA, it must “end the UNRWA dependency culture” 30 by encouraging individual empowerment, private investment, and free enterprise. These will give refugees an actual, not theoretical, opportunity to succeed in the world economy. Ironically, perhaps, but appropriately, this will lead to the gradual elimination of UNRWA.

By contrast with UNRWA, the UNHCR has demonstrated transparency and proven that refugees will respond to reasonable requirements for their accountability. UNHCR’s definition of ‘refugee’, its requirements for realistic decisions by refugees and its refusal to intervene or take sides in the internal affairs of host governments ensures its continued success at the mission for which both organizations were founded.

This report, therefore, recommends the dissolution of UNRWA as a chartered U.N organization and the absorption of those UNRWA employees and/or programs consistent with a resettlement (repatriation) mission into UNHCR.


Critics may argue that our recommendation overlooks the enormous political difficulties and financial costs of managing severance for UNRWA’s 30,000 Palestinian employees or, alternatively, that absorbing UNRWA into UNHCR might result
in a ‘reverse acquisition’ of UNHCR by an ideologically-focused and media-savvy UNRWA.

We believe these criticisms can be answered persuasively,
but doing so goes beyond the remit of this report.


PALESTINIAN REFUGEES AND REFUGEE AGENCIES
Anti Defamation League  

(Editors Note - The UN has two refugee agencies.    UNHCR which has a world-wide role and UNWRA which only deals with the Palestinians.  

Each has its own definitions of ‘Refugee’ .  The Palestinian problem only exists because of the existence of UNWRA.  If it had not existed the Palestinians would nave been resettled in Arab countries. Approximately 1,600,000 Jews left Arab countries between 1948 and 2012. Of these 856,000 left in 1948.  They have all been resettled. Today there are very few Jews left in Arab countries see Expulsion of Jews From Arab Countries     This was set up due to pressure from Arab oil producing countries.  If the Arabs had no oil there would probably have been no UNWRA)     

See     VIDEOS    Jewish vs Palestinian Refugees AND Why Are There Still Palestinians REFUGEES?

One result is that that they have often become political pawns.  An example is Lebanon where 455,000 are registered with UNWRA and live in the country’s 12 refugee camps while at least 1,500,000 Syrian refugees come under UNHCR (see A Tale of Two Organizations UNRWA and UNHCR in Lebanon’ by Lucie Mackova) and Syrian Refugees in Lebanon Live in Fear of Deportation by Olivia Alabaster |

After the 1948 war, around 156,000 Arabs remained in Israel and became full Israeli citizens with representatives in the Israel Knesset (parliament).

The UN Conciliation Commission for Palestine estimated that the number of Palestinian refugees displaced from Israel was 711,000.  The Arab League instructed its members to deny Palestinians citizenship "to avoid dissolution of their identity and protect their right of return to their homeland."

The United Nations established UNRWA as a relief and human development to provide them with humanitarian assistance.

Refugee status was passed on to their descendants, who were largely denied citizenship in Arab states, except in Jordan.  More than 1.4 million Palestinians still live in 58 recognized refugee camps, while more than 5 million Palestinians live outside Israel and the Palestinian territories.

The Palestinian refugee problem and debate about the Palestinian right of return are  major issues of the Arab-Israeli conflict. Palestinians and their supporters have staged annual demonstrations and commemorations on 15 May of each year, which is known to them as "Nakba Day".

In 2012, the number of registered patrilineal descendants of the original "Palestine refugees", based on the UNRWA registration requirements is estimated to be 4,950,000, of which an estimated 1.5 million live in UNRWA camps. The number of original refugees "who meet UNRWA’s Palestine Refugee criteria" has declined from 711,000 in 1950 to approximately 30,000 to 50,000 in 2012.


Go to

UNWRA and UNHCR